Skoda is known for its premium and powerful cars. Two of its popular SUVs – Skoda Kodiaq and Skoda Kushaq – offer exciting driving experiences. While Kodiaq is a full-size 7-seater SUV with a strong road presence, the Kushaq is a more compact 5-seater SUV designed for city and highway comfort.
But if you’re wondering which one is faster when it comes to 0-100 kph sprint and rolling acceleration, this article will help you understand the difference in simple words.
Basic Difference Between Kodiaq and Kushaq
| Feature | Skoda Kodiaq | Skoda Kushaq |
| Segment | Full-size SUV (7-seater) | Compact SUV (5-seater) |
| Engine | 2.0L TSI Turbo Petrol | 1.0L or 1.5L TSI Petrol |
| Power Output | 190 PS | 115 PS (1.0L), 150 PS (1.5L) |
| Transmission | 7-speed DSG Automatic | 6-speed MT/AT or 7-speed DSG |
| Drive Type | AWD | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Price Range (ex-showroom) | ₹38-42 lakh | ₹11-19 lakh |
0-100 Kph Acceleration: Who’s Quicker?
Let’s look at how fast these SUVs go from 0 to 100 kilometers per hour:
Skoda Kodiaq
- Engine: 2.0-litre turbo petrol
- Power: 190 PS
- 0-100 kph time: ~8.3 seconds
Skoda Kushaq 1.5 TSI
- Engine: 1.5-litre turbo petrol
- Power: 150 PS
- 0-100 kph time: ~8.6 seconds
Although the Kodiaq is bigger and heavier, its powerful 2.0L engine helps it reach 100 kph in just about 8.3 seconds. On the other hand, the lighter Kushaq 1.5 also delivers impressive performance with only a slight difference.
Winner (0-100 kph): Skoda Kodiaq (by a small margin)
If you compare it with the Kushaq 1.0L variant, then the difference becomes more noticeable:
Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI
- Power: 115 PS
- 0-100 kph time: ~10.6 seconds
Rolling Acceleration (20-80 kph / 40-100 kph)
Rolling acceleration shows how quickly a car can overtake on highways. Let’s compare the 20-80 kph and 40-100 kph times, which are useful in real driving.
20-80 kph (in Kickdown – using full throttle)
| Variant | Time (20-80 kph) |
| Kodiaq 2.0 TSI | ~5.3 seconds |
| Kushaq 1.5 TSI | ~5.5 seconds |
| Kushaq 1.0 TSI | ~7.3 seconds |
40-100 kph (Overtake Acceleration)
| Variant | Time (40-100 kph) |
| Kodiaq 2.0 TSI | ~6.2 seconds |
| Kushaq 1.5 TSI | ~6.5 seconds |
| Kushaq 1.0 TSI | ~9.0 seconds |
Winner (Rolling Acceleration): Again, Kodiaq takes the lead, but only slightly over the 1.5L Kushaq.
The Kushaq 1.0L is clearly not meant for fast overtakes, and it feels slower when trying to pass other vehicles.
Real World Performance: Which One Feels Faster?
Even though Kodiaq has better 0-100 kph and rolling acceleration numbers, the Kushaq 1.5L feels lighter and more agile, especially in city traffic. The smaller size and front-wheel-drive layout make it easier to handle.
On the other hand, Kodiaq offers more confidence at higher speeds, thanks to its all-wheel-drive (AWD) system and bigger engine.
Driving Experience
| Driving Aspect | Skoda Kodiaq | Skoda Kushaq |
| Highway Cruising | Stable, powerful, great for long trips | Quick, light, best for solo/family trips |
| City Driving | A bit bulky, but smooth | Very easy and comfortable |
| Fuel Economy | Lower (~11-13 kmpl) | Better (~16-18 kmpl for 1.5L) |
| Ride Quality | Plush and mature | Sporty and fun |
Final Verdict: Which One Should You Pick?
- Pick Kodiaq if you want a powerful SUV with more comfort, features, AWD, and better high-speed performance. Ideal for long trips and families.
- Pick Kushaq 1.5 TSI if you want a more affordable, fun-to-drive SUV that still gives you very close performance.
Conclusion:
In pure performance terms, Skoda Kodiaq wins the 0-100 and rolling acceleration battle. But the Kushaq 1.5L is not far behind, and it offers great value for money with sporty performance.
So, both cars are fast in their own way – it depends on your budget, needs, and driving style.
